HomeAdvisor / Angi Leads vs Meta Ads for Home Service Businesses.
HomeAdvisor (now Angi) sells the same lead to 3–6 contractors. Meta ads give you exclusive leads at a fraction of the cost. Here's the math.
The Short Answer
Meta Ads wins on almost every metric: half the cost per lead, 3–5× higher close rate (because leads are exclusive), and you own the pixel data. The only reason to stay on HomeAdvisor is if your team can't handle lead generation via an ad campaign — which is a team problem, not a platform problem.
Head-to-Head. 10 Categories.
Real benchmarks from managing HomeAdvisor / Angi and Meta Ads side-by-side across 200+ home service accounts. Your numbers will vary by market, offer, and timing.
When HomeAdvisor / Angi Wins
- You're a brand-new contractor with zero reviews and need leads TODAY (use for 90 days max while you build review volume)
- You genuinely can't commit to a management + creative investment and just want to pay per lead with no involvement
- Your market has no Meta ad traction (very rare — usually a creative problem)
When Meta Ads Wins
- You want lower cost per booked job
- You want exclusive leads (not fighting 5 other contractors on every call)
- You want to build a long-term marketing asset (pixel, customer audiences)
- You want control over who sees your ads and what they see
- You've already tried HomeAdvisor and felt burned by lead quality
- You have reviews, a decent offer, and can follow up within an hour
The Real Cost Difference.
Averaged across managed accounts over the last 12 months. Your numbers depend on market competitiveness, offer strength, and follow-up speed.
Cost Per Lead
HOMEADVISOR / ANGI
$60–$150
META ADS
$10–$35
Close Rate
HOMEADVISOR / ANGI
3–8%
META ADS
10–22%
Cost Per Booked Job
HOMEADVISOR / ANGI
$750–$3,000
META ADS
$80–$300
Always measure cost per booked job, not cost per lead. A low CPL with bad close rate is worse than a higher CPL that actually converts. Single most common mistake in home service advertising.
Our Actual Recommendation
The typical home service business on HomeAdvisor/Angi spends $800–$2,000/mo on the subscription + per-lead fees and closes 5–8 jobs from it. That's $200–$400 per booked job on a good month, $400+ on a bad month.
The same $2,000/mo on Meta ads — split $500/mo management + $1,500/mo ad spend with an agency — typically generates 40–80 exclusive leads per month at $80–$250 per booked job. 3–5× better unit economics, permanent brand equity, and you keep the customer list.
If you're subscribed to HomeAdvisor right now and debating whether to keep it — run the math on your last 90 days. Total subscription + lead fees ÷ number of jobs actually booked = your real cost per acquired customer. 9 out of 10 contractors who do this math quit inside 30 days.
The transition playbook: don't cancel HomeAdvisor immediately. Launch Meta for 60 days in parallel. Once Meta is producing equivalent or better volume at half the cost, cancel HomeAdvisor. Most contractors hit this crossover between week 6 and week 10.
HomeAdvisor / Angi vs Meta Ads: Straight Answers.
Why is HomeAdvisor so much more expensive per closed job?
Three reasons. One: shared leads — if HomeAdvisor sells your lead to 5 contractors, your close rate structurally can't be more than 20%, and it's usually much less. Two: per-lead fees scale with lead cost, not lead quality. Three: no retargeting — a missed HomeAdvisor lead is gone forever; a missed Meta lead is in your pixel audience and can be re-sold to.
Does HomeAdvisor actually generate 'bad' leads or am I just not closing well?
Both. HomeAdvisor's lead categorization is famously loose — price-shoppers get grouped with serious buyers. A 'roofing lead' might be someone asking about $200 of spot repair and another might be a $40,000 full replacement. The tier-1 agencies that succeed on HomeAdvisor have rigorous initial qualification scripts.
I've been on HomeAdvisor for years — won't I lose the repeat business if I quit?
Very few HomeAdvisor customers are repeat business (most home services are low-frequency purchases). The customer LIST you've built via HomeAdvisor stays with you — export it, upload it to Meta as a custom audience, and build lookalikes. You keep the customers, drop the lead-gen.
Is there any scenario where HomeAdvisor is clearly better than Meta?
If you cannot commit 6+ weeks to learning how ads work (even with an agency), HomeAdvisor is the lower-cognitive-load option. That's it. Everything else favors Meta for contractors with any operational maturity.
What about Thumbtack or Porch? Are those better than HomeAdvisor?
Same business model — shared leads, you pay per lead or per job. Thumbtack tends to have slightly better lead quality but similar economics. Porch has smaller volume. All three are pay-to-play lead directories with identical fundamental limitations: you don't own the lead, you compete with other contractors on every lead, and you build zero long-term asset.
Not Sure Which One Is Right For You?
Book a free 30-minute strategy call. We'll look at your business, your market, and your goals — and tell you honestly which option (or combination) fits.
Book My Free Strategy Call